高分急求英文翻译！！在线等！！

In recent years, as a result of our country democratic progress's unceasing advancement, the media freedom of speech also had gradual letting loose. Some pasts might and so on “the chief leader” was pressing by the party politics the question, now somewhat must attain under the sun, accepted people's surveillance. But in the media opinion's freedom certain extent has also interfered with the normal judicature administration of justice. The news media places on trial the case to the court the report to realize the public right to know, the transparency which and the public surface the expanded case places on trial, urged the court fairly, honest, civilized, to place on trial the case aspect to play the positive role highly effective, but media surveillance while produced positive influence to the court administration of justice, also gave the case administration of justice to bring some negative influences, for instance the report was one-sided, misleading audiences, disturbance trial and so on. From this creates was reported that the object withstanding huge public opinion pressure, causes its personality, the reputation, the property and so on possibly to suffer the huge injury and the loss. At present China appears some “the news trial” in the certain extent has affected the normal judicial trial situation, therefore, under this kind of new situation, how both can display the mass media fully to the judicature the surveillance and the promoter action, and must avoid the mass media the negative influence which possibly creates to the judicature: The freedom of the press which legally both must protect the citizen to enjoy the freedom of speech which and the media enjoys, and must maintain the jurisdiction independence the principle and judicature's authority. The author from the news trial, the news right infringement, the media and judicature's relations and media aspects and so on supervision of public opinion elaborates the reason which and some concrete performance it produces, proposed that solves these question means as well as both achieves the harmonious unification to the realistic society's significance.
新闻审判；News trial
媒体介入；Media involvement
舆论监督；Supervision of public opinion
司法公正；The judicature is fair
对策。 Countermeasure

Chinese abstract: In recent years, as a result of our country democratic progress's unceasing advancement, the media freedom of speech also had gradual letting loose. Some pasts might and so on “the chief leader” was pressing by the party politics the question, now somewhat must attain under the sun, accepted people's surveillance. But in the media opinion's freedom certain extent has also interfered with the normal judicature administration of justice. The news media places on trial the case to the court the report to realize the public right to know, the transparency which and the public surface the expanded case places on trial, urged the court fairly, honest, civilized, to place on trial the case aspect to play the positive role highly effective, but media surveillance while produced positive influence to the court administration of justice, also gave the case administration of justice to bring some negative influences, for instance the report was one-sided, misleading audiences, disturbance trial and so on. From this creates was reported that the object withstanding huge public opinion pressure, causes its personality, the reputation, the property and so on possibly to suffer the huge injury and the loss. At present China appears some “the news trial” in the certain extent has affected the normal judicial trial situation, therefore, under this kind of new situation, how both can display the mass media fully to the judicature the surveillance and the promoter action, and must avoid the mass media the negative influence which possibly creates to the judicature: The freedom of the press which legally both must protect the citizen to enjoy the freedom of speech which and the media enjoys, and must maintain the jurisdiction independence the principle and judicature's authority. The author from the news trial, the news right infringement, the media and judicature's relations and media aspects and so on supervision of public opinion elaborates the reason which and some concrete performance it produces, proposed that solves these question means as well as both achieves the harmonious unification to the realistic society's significance.

Key word(关键词): News trial; Media involvement; Supervision of public opinion; The judicature is fair; Countermeasure.

Chinese Abstract: In recent years, China to continuously promote the democratic process, the media's freedom of expression has also gradually opened up. Some of the past by the party and government and other "leaders" were Crimping the problem, now more or less the total to be received under the sun, to accept the people's supervision. Media freedom of speech but also a certain extent, affected the normal judicial trials. The news media on the court trial of the cases reported in achieving the public's right to know, to expand the transparency of trials and public face, to the court just, honest, civilized and efficient trials has played a positive role, but the media in supervision of the court trial work The positive impact, but also to the case of work which had some negative impact, such as one-sided reports, misleading the audience, disrupted the trial, and so on. The resulting object was reported under tremendous pressure from public opinion to character, reputation, property, and so may suffer tremendous damage and loss. At present, China's emergence of some "news trial" a certain extent, affected the normal justice, and therefore, in this new situation, how it is necessary to give full play to mass media in the administration of justice and the promotion of supervision, to avoid the mass media The administration of justice may have negative effects: it is necessary to protect citizens enjoy freedom of expression in accordance with the law and the media enjoy freedom of the press, while maintaining the principle of judicial independence and judicial authority. I tried from the press, news infringement, the relationship between the media and the judiciary and the media, and other aspects of public opinion on the cause and its specific performance, to propose solutions to these problems and achieve a harmonious unity between the reality of social significance.

Key words: news trial; media intervention; supervision by public opinion; justice; countermeasures.

Chinese abstract: In recent years, as a result of our country democratic progress's unceasing advancement, the media freedom of speech also had gradual letting loose. Some pasts might and so on “the chief leader” was pressing by the party politics the question, now somewhat must attain under the sun, accepted people's surveillance. But in the media opinion's freedom certain extent has also interfered with the normal judicature administration of justice. The news media places on trial the case to the court the report to realize the public right to know, the transparency which and the public surface the expanded case places on trial, urged the court fairly, honest, civilized, to place on trial the case aspect to play the positive role highly effective, but media surveillance while produced positive influence to the court administration of justice, also gave the case administration of justice to bring some negative influences, for instance the report was one-sided, misleading audiences, disturbance trial and so on. From this creates was reported that the object withstanding huge public opinion pressure, causes its personality, the reputation, the property and so on possibly to suffer the huge injury and the loss. At present China appears some “the news trial” in the certain extent has affected the normal judicial trial situation, therefore, under this kind of new situation, how both can display the mass media fully to the judicature the surveillance and the promoter action, and must avoid the mass media the negative influence which possibly creates to the judicature: The freedom of the press which legally both must protect the citizen to enjoy the freedom of speech which and the media enjoys, and must maintain the jurisdiction independence the principle and judicature's authority. The author from the news trial, the news right infringement, the media and judicature's relations and media aspects and so on supervision of public opinion elaborates the reason which and some concrete performance it produces, proposed that solves these question means as well as both achieves the harmonious unification to the realistic society's significance.
Key word(关键词): News trial新闻审判； Media involvement媒体介入 ；Supervision of public opinion 舆论监督；The judicature is fair司法公正；Countermeasure对策。

Chinese Abstract: In recent years, China to continuously promote the democratic process, the media's freedom of expression has also gradually opened up. Some of the past by the party and government and other "leaders" were Crimping the problem, now more or less the total to be received under the sun, to accept the people's supervision. Media freedom of speech but also a certain extent, affected the normal judicial trials. The news media on the court trial of the cases reported in achieving the public's right to know, to expand the transparency of trials and public face, to the court just, honest, civilized and efficient trials has played a positive role, but the media in supervision of the court trial work The positive impact, but also to the case of work which had some negative impact, such as one-sided reports, misleading the audience, disrupted the trial, and so on. The resulting object was reported under tremendous pressure from public opinion to character, reputation, property, and so may suffer tremendous damage and loss. At present, China's emergence of some "news trial" a certain extent, affected the normal justice, and therefore, in this new situation, how it is necessary to give full play to mass media in the administration of justice and the promotion of supervision, to avoid the mass media The administration of justice may have negative effects: it is necessary to protect citizens enjoy freedom of expression in accordance with the law and the media enjoy freedom of the press, while maintaining the principle of judicial independence and judicial authority. I tried from the press, news infringement, the relationship between the media and the judiciary and the media, and other aspects of public opinion on the cause and its specific performance, to propose solutions to these problems and achieve a harmonious unity between the reality of social significance.